Refinance Merchant Cash Advance: Your Options for High-Cost MCA Debt

Introduction

‍

A true one-to-one refinance of a merchant cash advance rarely exists. Because an MCA is structured as a purchase of future receivables rather than a traditional loan, there is no standard mechanism for swapping it out the way you would refinance a mortgage or business loan. What founders actually do is replace the MCA with different financing, negotiate a settlement, or restructure payments through a workout. As altLINE (a bank-affiliated lender, updated May 12, 2026) explains, “refinancing” an MCA generally means securing new financing that pays the advance off, not obtaining a cheaper version of the same product.

‍

This guide is for founders of ecommerce and digital businesses currently repaying one or more merchant cash advances who want lower daily or weekly debits, lower overall cost, or a clear path out of stacked MCA debt. It is not a manual for defaulting, not legal advice, and not a guarantee that any specific business will qualify for the options described. Readers should consult their own lawyer and CPA before making decisions based on anything here.

‍

Can you refinance a merchant cash advance, and how? Relief is sometimes possible through replacement funding (term loans, revenue-based financing, invoice finance) or negotiated settlements, but whether you qualify depends on your cash flow, business performance, existing debt levels, and the specific terms in your MCA contract.

‍

Here is what you will take away from this article:

‍

• How to calculate the real cost of an MCA using factor rates, total payback, and cost per month.
• When it makes financial sense to pursue refinancing options versus riding the MCA out.
• What realistic “refinance merchant cash advance” paths exist, and which marketing pitches to avoid.
• A step-by-step checklist to prepare for a payoff or replacement funding application.

‍

Understanding Merchant Cash Advances and “Refinancing”

‍

A merchant cash advance gives a business a lump sum of cash in exchange for a fixed portion of its future sales. It is not a traditional loan; the funder is purchasing future receivables at a discount. That distinction matters because it means MCAs fall outside most lending regulations, carry no stated interest rates, and operate under purchase agreements rather than loan covenants.

‍

Ecommerce and digital brands commonly end up with MCAs because they need capital fast (businesses can receive MCA funding in 48 to 72 hours), because their credit rating or operating history is too thin for bank financing, and because inventory spikes, ad campaigns, or seasonal demand create urgent working capital gaps. The speed comes at a price: daily or weekly ACH debits that continue regardless of whether sales hold up, creating cash flow pressure that compounds during slow periods.

‍

How Merchant Cash Advances Really Work

‍

The basic structure works like this:

‍

• A business receives a lump sum (for example, $100,000) in exchange for a fixed “purchase amount” calculated by multiplying the advance by a factor rate (for example, 1.40, making the total payback $140,000). MCA loans typically have a factor rate between 1.1 and 1.5.
• Repayment happens through daily or weekly ACH debits from the business bank account, or through a holdback percentage of credit card sales. MCA repayments are based on a percentage of daily credit sales.
• There is no fixed term on paper, but repayment terms typically range from 3 to 18 months based on projected revenue.

‍

Key terms every founder needs to understand before evaluating refinancing options:

‍

• Factor rate: The multiplier applied to the advance amount to calculate total payback. A 1.45 factor rate on a $100,000 advance means you owe $145,000. Converted to an annualized cost, MCAs can be among the most expensive forms of business funding.
• Holdback/withhold percentage: The share of daily credit card sales or the fixed ACH debit amount the funder pulls from your merchant account each day or week.
• Personal guarantee: A clause making the founder personally liable if the business cannot repay.
• UCC-1 lien: A security filing giving the MCA funder a claim on your business assets or receivables.
• Confession of judgment (COJ): A contract provision allowing the funder to obtain a court judgment without a trial if you default, creating immediate legal action risk.

‍

Because the total payback is fixed by the factor rate, most MCA contracts do not offer true interest savings from early repayment. Unless the MCA agreement includes a documented discount clause, you owe the full contracted amount whether you pay it off in three months or twelve. MCA agreements may include early payoff penalties that can negate savings from refinancing.

‍

What “Refinance Merchant Cash Advance” Actually Means

‍

In practice, “refinancing” an MCA falls into a few distinct buckets:

‍

• Replacing the MCA with a lower-cost product: a term loan, business line of credit, revenue-based financing, or invoice finance that pays off the advance and carries better terms.
• Reverse consolidation: Per altLINE, this is new financing that reduces existing daily or weekly MCA debits for temporary relief while the business works toward full payoff. The original MCAs typically remain in place.
• Settlement or workout: Negotiating with MCA providers for a discounted payoff amount or a stretched repayment schedule.

‍

ABF Journal (August 25, 2026) observes that most MCAs are not immediately refinanced into conventional loans because the businesses carrying them don't yet meet the cash flow and underwriting criteria that traditional lenders require. The same article notes that most “consolidation” products marketed to MCA-burdened businesses are, in practice, new merchant cash advance transactions replacing existing ones, keeping the business in the MCA ecosystem rather than moving it toward conventional capital.

‍

Before searching for solutions, you need to determine whether your MCA is actually unaffordable or simply expensive but manageable. The next section covers how to tell the difference.

‍

Diagnosing When You Should Refinance an MCA

‍

Not every expensive MCA warrants the effort and risk of refinancing. Some advances are costly but short-lived enough that the total cost is tolerable relative to the revenue they generated. The decision to refinance should be driven by specific, quantifiable warning signs rather than a general sense that the money is expensive.

‍

Clearco (September 28, 2026) flags several signs that a merchant is overpaying on an MCA, including high factor rates, payments that absorb a large share of revenue, and repayment that accelerates as sales grow. The factor rate thresholds cited in that article are inconsistent (ranging from 1.3 to 1.5), but the underlying diagnostic framework is useful.

‍

Red Flags You're Overpaying on a Merchant Cash Advance

‍

These warning signs should trigger a serious evaluation of refinancing options:

‍

• Factor rates at or above 1.3 to 1.5 on a large advance. A $75,000 advance at a 1.45 factor rate means $108,750 in total payback; you are paying $33,750 for the capital. If that advance is repaid over six months, that is 45% of the advance in half a year, or about 7.5% per month.
• Daily or weekly payments consuming more than 20-25% of average weekly revenue. When MCA debits leave insufficient cash for inventory, ad spend, or payroll, the advance is actively constraining the business rather than fueling it. Refinancing can reduce daily payments from 20% to 10% of sales, freeing working capital.
• Payment floors that don't fall when sales dip. Some MCA contracts include minimum debit amounts regardless of revenue performance. Our “Hidden Fees in Ecommerce Funding Contracts” post explains why these payment floors create outsized risk during slow periods.
• Multiple merchant cash advances with overlapping debits. When two or three funders are pulling daily ACH debits from the same bank account, the combined drain often exceeds what the business can sustain. Refinancing can consolidate multiple MCAs into one payment, reducing administrative burden and financial strain.

‍

Consider a concrete example: an ecommerce brand doing $25,000 per week in revenue with a $75,000 MCA at 1.45 factor. Daily ACH debits of $1,200 total roughly $8,400 per week, consuming about 34% of revenue. That leaves $16,600 for COGS, ad spend, platform fees, and payroll. If the brand has a second advance with $600 daily debits on top of that, it is paying $12,600 per week in MCA obligations alone, more than half of revenue.

‍

Cash-Flow Pressure vs. Growth Opportunity

‍

Founders typically look to refinance for one of two reasons:

‍

Emergency: Cash flow is already negative after MCA debits and essential operating costs, and those daily or weekly withdrawals can negatively impact cash flow over time, not just during an immediate crunch. The business is experiencing overdrafts, missed vendor payments, or is close to defaulting. In this scenario, a short-term workout, settlement, or reverse consolidation might stabilize the situation, though these come with their own costs.

‍

Opportunity: The MCA is expensive but the business is stable and growing. The founder sees a clear growth initiative (Q4 inventory build, a new sales channel, expanded ad spend) that a lower cost financing structure would make viable. Here, replacing the MCA with a term loan or revenue-based financing makes more strategic sense.

‍

The distinction matters because the right refinancing path differs for each case. A structurally over-indebted business that takes on more debt without a plan just extends the pain. In either situation, the first step is to get precise numbers on what the MCA is actually costing.

‍

How to Analyze the True Cost of Your Merchant Cash Advance

‍

You cannot make a sound refinancing decision without knowing exactly what your existing debt is costing and how much remains. Comparing total costs, not just payments, is essential when evaluating refinancing. This section walks through a three-step analysis using realistic ecommerce numbers.

‍

Step 1: Gather the Critical Details

‍

Pull the following from each MCA contract and current statement:

‍

• Original advance amount (e.g., $80,000).
• Factor rate and total contracted payback (e.g., 1.4 factor = $112,000 payback).
• Daily or weekly debit amount, and whether it is a fixed ACH pull or a percentage of daily credit card sales.
• Current payoff balance. This number must come directly from the funder in writing; it is not simply the original payback minus payments made. Request a payoff quote with a validity date.
• Early payoff or prepayment language: does the MCA agreement offer any discount for early repayment, or do you owe the full factor amount regardless? Many MCA providers do not report payment history to credit bureaus, which limits credit building; this is another detail worth confirming.
• Any personal guarantee, UCC-1 lien, or confession of judgment attached to the contract.
• History of missed payments or NSFs on the account.

‍

Keep all of this in a single document. You will need it when speaking with any prospective new lender, and having it organized makes conversations faster and more transparent. Refinancing typically involves gathering business financial documents and current MCA information; having these ready shortens the timeline.

‍

Step 2: Calculate Total Cost and Monthly Cost

‍

Here is a straightforward way to compute cost without specialized software:

‍

1. Total dollar cost = total payback minus the amount you received. For a $100,000 advance at 1.45 factor rate: $145,000 - $100,000 = $45,000 in fees.
2. Cost per month = divide the dollar cost by the amount received, then by the expected repayment months. If you repay $145,000 over 10 months, the $45,000 cost is 45% of the advance, or roughly 4.5% per month. If that same advance is repaid in 4 months, the cost jumps to roughly 11% per month.

‍

This estimate is rough because MCAs don't quote an annual rate, but it provides a benchmark for comparison. Traditional bank term loans and SBA 7(a) loans (prime + 2%-4% for up to 10 years) typically cost far less over a year than an MCA repaid in a few months. When your MCA costs several percent of the advance every month, the gap between what you are paying and what replacement capital would cost becomes stark.

‍

Step 3: Project Remaining Time and Cash-Flow Impact

‍

With your remaining balance and current debit schedule, estimate:

‍

• Months remaining: If your outstanding balance is $60,000 and daily debits are $1,500 (roughly $45,000 per month), you have about 1.3 months left. If debits are $800 per day ($24,000 per month), you are looking at 2.5 months.
• Revenue share consumed: Divide total monthly MCA debits by average monthly revenue. If MCA payments take 30% or more of gross revenue, the advance is crowding out inventory replenishment, marketing, and payroll.

‍

Plot these numbers against your operating expenses for the next three to six months. Even a simple spreadsheet showing revenue minus MCA payments minus essential costs will reveal whether you are heading toward a cash shortfall or whether the MCA will burn off before it cripples operations.

‍

With these numbers in hand, you can evaluate actual replacement options.

‍

Refinance Merchant Cash Advance: Realistic Paths Out

‍

Refinancing is not a magic reset. Each path trades one set of terms for another, with different cost structures, eligibility requirements, and risks. Many “consolidation” and “reverse consolidation” offerings are, as ABF Journal and altLINE have documented, new MCA-style transactions that sit alongside or replace existing ones without genuinely reducing total cost. Refinancing should reduce financial strain and not merely delay debt repayment.

‍

Option 1: Replace Your MCA with Lower-Cost Term Debt

‍

A business term loan is the cleanest exit from MCA debt when the business qualifies. Term loans can save businesses thousands compared to MCA loans because of the rate differential and the shift from daily to monthly payments.

‍

Typical characteristics: interest rates far below MCA costs for established businesses, repayment over 2 to 5 years with predictable fixed monthly payments, and typically lower fees than existing merchant cash advances. Predictable fixed monthly payments facilitate budgeting compared to variable revenue-based payments.

‍

Businesses with at least 12 to 24 months in business, consistent revenue, a clean repayment history on the MCA, and an improved credit profile are more likely to be eligible for this path. Traditional lenders require strong credit scores and solid financial records for refinancing. Most refinancing providers prefer at least three months of payment history on the existing advance.

‍

Worked example: A $100,000 MCA at 1.45 factor costs $145,000 in total payback over roughly 8 months, with daily debits of approximately $600. A hypothetical $100,000 term loan at 14% annual interest over 36 months costs approximately $123,000 in total (principal plus interest), with monthly payments around $3,420. The term loan saves $22,000 in total cost and replaces $18,000 per month in MCA debits with $3,420 per month. Refinanced loans may also provide additional working capital on top of the payoff amount, which can fund the growth initiative that prompted the original MCA.

‍

Option 2: Revenue-Based Financing and Performance-Tied Repayment

‍

Revenue-based financing sits between MCAs and term loans. Repayment is tied to a fixed share of monthly sales, which means payments adjust with revenue rather than staying rigid during slow periods. Refinancing can improve cash flow by reducing payment pressure and providing predictable repayment schedules.

‍

RBF structures are generally more transparent than MCAs: fees are stated as a flat percentage rather than hidden inside a factor rate, and contracts tend to include fewer aggressive provisions (no confessions of judgment, no or limited personal guarantees). For ecommerce brands with seasonal revenue swings, the variable payment structure reduces the risk of overdrafts during off-peak months.

‍

An ecommerce brand that has paid down or stabilized its MCA obligations could use an RBF facility to fund inventory and marketing cycles going forward, avoiding the need to return to MCAs.

‍

Option 3: Invoice Finance and Receivables-Based Funding

‍

For brands with B2B invoices, marketplace payouts on net-30 or net-60 terms, or wholesale receivables, invoice financing can release cash at a much lower cost than an MCA. A typical invoice factor advances 80-90% of the invoice value and charges fees of 0.75% to 3.5% per invoice, well below the 30-50% premium built into most MCA factor rates.

‍

The practical use case: an ecommerce brand selling wholesale to retailers with 60-day payment terms uses invoice funding to cover operations and free up internal cash to accelerate MCA payoff. A business line of credit can also pay off an MCA balance in full when the business has sufficient receivables or revenue to support it. This works best when the brand has creditworthy customers and predictable invoice volumes. It does not apply to pure direct-to-consumer brands with no B2B receivables.

‍

Option 4: Consolidation, Reverse Consolidation, and Settlements

‍

These structures are the most commonly marketed “solutions” for MCA debt, but they are also the most frequently misunderstood.

‍

Consolidation means one new funder pays off multiple advances and replaces them with a single facility. In most cases, per ABF Journal, this new facility is itself an MCA-style product with a new factor rate and daily debits. Refinancing can consolidate multiple MCAs into a single payment, which simplifies financial management by reducing the number of payments due. But the total cost often increases.

‍

Reverse consolidation, as described by altLINE, involves new financing that makes deposits into the business account to offset existing MCA debits, reducing the net daily cash outflow while the business works toward payoff. The original MCAs typically remain in place. FynFund published an example (April 2026): a merchant with three MCAs totaling $100,000 in remaining balances and combined daily debits of $1,520 took a reverse consolidation advance of $110,000 at a 1.38 factor rate over six months. Daily debits dropped to $950, providing $570 per day in relief. But total new payback was $151,800, meaning the merchant paid roughly $51,800 more than the remaining balance on the original MCAs. LegalClarity (mid-2026) has noted that reverse consolidation products often increase total debt and add tax treatment complexity.

‍

Settlement/workout involves negotiating directly with MCA providers. An IFA Commercial Factor article by an MCA stacking-solutions provider reports that providers have, in some cases, cut automatic debits by 50-75% for 30-60 days to give businesses breathing room, and accepted payoffs at 25-50% below the stated remaining balance. These figures are reported by the provider and are promotional; real outcomes vary based on negotiating position, contract terms, and the funder's risk appetite. Any workout strategy should involve an experienced attorney familiar with MCA litigation, especially where confessions of judgment or personal guarantees are involved.

‍

Option 5: SBA and Government-Backed Loans (Proceed with Caution)

‍

SBA 7(a) loans, with rates of prime + 2%-4% and terms up to 10 years, represent some of the lowest cost capital available to small businesses. In theory, they could replace expensive MCA debt with a much lower cost, longer term obligation.

‍

The problem: ABF Journal's August 2026 article claims that recent SBA policy changes prohibit using SBA proceeds to refinance MCAs or MCA settlement obligations, but this claim is not supported by an official citation. Other sources continue to list SBA loans as a viable MCA exit path. The policy question is unresolved. Business owners should verify current rules directly on sba.gov or through an SBA-approved lender before assuming SBA funds can be used to pay off existing MCA obligations.

‍

Step-by-Step Process to Refinance or Replace an MCA

‍

This is a practical roadmap founders can follow over two to four weeks. The goal is to secure a solution that leaves the business with better net cash flow and lower total cost, not just new debt.

‍

1. Build Your MCA Payoff and Contract Checklist

‍

Compile the following for each MCA:

‍

• Funder name and contact details
• Original advance amount and date funded
• Factor rate and total contracted payback
• Current payoff quote (requested in writing, with a stated validity date)
• Daily or weekly debit amount and frequency
• Any personal guarantee language, UCC-1 liens, or confessions of judgment
• History of missed payments or NSFs
• Early payoff or discount provisions (or confirmation that none exist)

‍

This single document becomes the foundation for every conversation with a potential replacement funder, attorney, or CPA.

‍

2. Clean Up Your Payment History and Cash-Flow Story

‍

Replacement funders will look at your last 3 to 6 months of bank statements and tax returns to judge risk. Before applying:

‍

• Stabilize MCA payments for at least 2 to 3 months if possible. Fewer NSFs and no bounced debits demonstrate reliability. Most refinancing providers prefer at least three months of payment history.
• Ensure business bank accounts reflect consistent revenue deposits and controlled outgoing multiple payments.
• Prepare a concise narrative explaining what caused the original MCA need and what has changed since: revenue growth, margin improvements, new sales channels, or reduced dependence on paid acquisition.

‍

MCA refinancing may involve stricter qualification criteria compared to original MCAs, so the stronger your financial story, the more options open up.

‍

3. Compare Replacement Funding Scenarios Side by Side

‍

‍

Who each option fits: Term loans suit businesses with stable profits, strong credit, and 12+ months of operating history. Revenue-based financing fits fast-growing brands reinvesting heavily with variable monthly revenue. Invoice finance works for businesses with B2B receivables or platform payouts on delayed settlement. Under severe stress, a settlement or reverse consolidation may be the only short-term option, though it rarely lowers total cost.

‍

Always compare offers on total payback, not just the headline payment amount, and expect application, origination, administrative, and underwriting fees to be part of any replacement offer because high fees can negate the benefits of refinancing.

‍

4. Time the Payoff to Minimize Overlap and Risk

‍

Coordination matters:

‍

• Secure a firm approval and funding date from any new lender before cancelling or changing existing MCAs.
• Use new funds to pay MCA providers directly where possible; this avoids the money sitting in your account and being grabbed by an existing ACH debit.
• Get written confirmation from each MCA funder that the advance is fully satisfied and that any UCC-1 filing or COJ will be released. Without this, the old funder retains a claim on your business assets.

‍

Avoid stacking multiple advances when refinancing to prevent worsening cash flow issues. Taking an additional MCA to “bridge” into a future refinance almost always deepens the problem rather than solving it.

‍

5. Prevent the Next MCA Cycle

‍

Getting out of MCA debt is only half the job. Staying out requires structural changes:

‍

• Build a small cash reserve during strong months, especially ahead of seasonal dips. Even 2 to 4 weeks of operating expenses in reserve reduces the likelihood of emergency borrowing.
• Develop a clear funding plan for big inventory or marketing pushes. Pre-approved RBF capacity or a business line of credit eliminates the pressure to grab the first available capital.
• Track unit economics and payback on ad spend. When you know your customer acquisition cost and contribution margin, you can determine when additional capital truly drives profitable growth versus when it just covers cash shortfalls.

‍

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

‍

Many founders trying to refinance merchant cash advances end up in worse positions because of misleading refinancing offers or rushed decisions made under pressure. Here are the specific traps and how to sidestep them.

‍

Problem 1: “Refinancing” That's Really Just Stacking More MCAs

‍

Some offers claim to “pay off” current MCAs but actually add new daily debits without fully clearing old ones, or extend total payback at equal or worse cost. The business ends up with more contracts, more debits, and more total business debt.

‍

How to avoid it: Insist on written payoff letters from every MCA being replaced. Demand a clear, side-by-side total cost comparison between the original structure and the proposed new one. Confirm in writing that any replaced MCAs will stop debiting your account and that associated liens will be released.

‍

Problem 2: Misunderstanding Early-Payment Clauses

‍

Many MCA contracts require full factor payback even if you repay early. There is no interest rebate. Unless the MCA contract contains explicit discount or pro-rated fee language, prepaying does not save money; it just shortens the timeline.

‍

How to avoid it: Have a lawyer or experienced advisor review prepayment language in your MCA contract before assuming early payoff creates savings. Get any “discounted payoff” offers from the funder in writing with specific dates and conditions. Factor these terms into your cost calculations when comparing refinancing options.

‍

Problem 3: Ignoring Legal Exposure (Liens, COJs, Guarantees)

‍

Confessions of judgment can allow a funder to obtain a court judgment without trial, especially in jurisdictions where COJ enforcement remains available. UCC-1 liens on business assets can block your ability to secure new credit, equipment financing, or inventory funding. Personal guarantees put your personal assets at risk if the business cannot repay.

‍

How to avoid it: Before entering any workout, settlement, or new financing arrangement, consult a commercial lawyer familiar with MCA litigation. Confirm in writing when each lien, COJ, and guarantee will be released upon payoff. Do not assume that paying off an advance automatically removes legal encumbrances; releases often require separate action.

‍

Problem 4: Choosing a New Lender Only on Speed

‍

Distressed founders often default to whoever can fund in 24-48 hours, regardless of long-term cost. Speed is how business owners find themselves in MCAs in the first place; repeating that pattern with a replacement product defeats the purpose.

‍

How to avoid it: Set minimum standards before you start shopping. Define your maximum acceptable factor rate or total cost, your preferred repayment frequency, and the payment structure that fits your revenue volatility. Take at least one business day to compare 2-3 offers on total payback, cash flow impact, and contract flexibility. Any saving only materializes if you choose the right replacement, not the fastest one.

‍

Conclusion and Next Steps

‍

Refinancing a merchant cash advance usually means replacing or restructuring it with a different kind of financing. The right move depends on your numbers, your contract terms, and your growth outlook. There is no universal answer; a brand with $500,000 in stacked MCA obligations and weak collateral faces a different path than a profitable business with one advance and strong monthly revenue.

‍

Every founder considering this move should:

‍

• Do the basic cost math (total payback, cost per month, share of revenue consumed).
• Build the payoff checklist with exact balances, factor rates, debit schedules, and legal provisions.
• Seek professional legal and CPA input before signing anything new.

‍

Concrete next steps:

‍

1. Within the next 24 hours: Gather all MCA contracts, request current payoff quotes, and pull the last 3-6 months of bank statements.
2. This week: Build your payoff checklist and run basic cost-versus-replacement scenarios using the framework in this article.
3. Over the next 2 weeks: Speak with at least one trusted advisor (lawyer, CPA, or experienced founder) and 1-2 alternative funding providers to discuss whether you are eligible for non-MCA options and choose the path that lowers total cost and simplifies payment management.

‍

Where we fit: we don't refinance, pay off or consolidate other providers' advances or loans. For planned working capital, such as an inventory build or a marketing push, our Term Loans (UK and US) offer $10K to $2M with one fixed fee and no personal guarantees, and in the US our Line of Credit means you only pay interest on what you use. Decisions come within 24 hours, and applying doesn't affect your credit score.

‍

For deeper context on MCA mechanics and risks, see our guide to merchant cash advances for ecommerce brands. For more on liens, payment floors, and contract traps, read Hidden Fees in Ecommerce Funding Contracts.

‍

This article is general information, not legal, tax, or investment advice. Consult your own lawyer, CPA, or financial advisor before making decisions about refinancing, settling, or restructuring any merchant cash advance or business debt.

‍

Additional Resources

‍

Key documents to keep on file:

‍

• All MCA agreements (original and any amendments)
• Written payoff letters with validity dates
• Bank statements (last 6 months minimum)
• Business financial statements, profit and loss reports, and tax returns
• UCC-1 filing records (searchable via your state's Secretary of State)

‍

External references:

‍

• SBA.gov loan programs for current eligibility rules on using SBA proceeds to refinance existing debt
• altLINE: Can you refinance a merchant cash advance? for a lender's perspective on MCA refinancing and reverse consolidation
• ABF Journal: Can merchant cash advances be refinanced? for industry analysis (note: author is affiliated with a consulting firm and some claims are uncited)

‍

Glossary of Essential Terms:

‍

• Factor rate: Multiplier (e.g., 1.30, 1.45) applied to the advance amount to determine total payback. Not an interest rate.
• Holdback: The percentage of daily credit card sales or the fixed daily ACH amount withheld by the MCA funder.
• UCC-1 lien: A Uniform Commercial Code filing that gives a creditor a security interest in specified business assets or receivables.
• Confession of judgment (COJ): A contract clause allowing a creditor to obtain a court judgment against the borrower without a trial.
• Revenue-based financing (RBF): Funding repaid as a fixed percentage of monthly or daily sales, with payments that adjust based on revenue performance.
• Reverse consolidation: A financing arrangement where a new funder deposits money into the business account to offset existing MCA debits, typically without paying off the original advances.
• Prepayment penalties: Fees or forfeited discounts charged when a borrower pays off an obligation before the scheduled end date; in MCAs, this often means owing the full factor amount regardless of when you pay.

‍