Wayflyer Alternatives: 10 Funding Options Ecommerce Brands Should Compare in 2026

Introduction

‍

Wayflyer is one of the most recognized non-dilutive funding providers for ecommerce brands, and for good reason. It has built a strong track record with fast approvals, transparent fees, and dedicated account management. But even satisfied Wayflyer customers sometimes discover that another financing provider could be a better structural fit as their business evolves. That's exactly what this guide to Wayflyer alternatives addresses: not an escape plan, but a clear-eyed comparison of the options available in 2026.

‍

Ecommerce founders and CFOs search for Wayflyer alternatives for several practical reasons. Some are outgrowing Wayflyer's fee structure at higher funding volumes, where even small differences in total cost translate to tens of thousands of dollars. Others want a different repayment mechanism: a fixed term loan or revolving line of credit rather than a revenue share model. Some don't meet Wayflyer's specific eligibility criteria (it requires brands to hold their own inventory, excluding pure dropshippers). And many founders simply want multi-product flexibility: a single platform that can handle a cash advance, a line of credit, and inventory financing simultaneously, rather than a narrower product set.

‍

This article focuses specifically on non-dilutive funding options designed for e commerce businesses: revenue based financing, merchant cash advances, inventory financing, and lines of credit. We are not covering equity VC, personal loans, or generic bank overdrafts. The target audience is founders and CFOs of ecommerce and digital brands generating at least ~$50K–$100K+ in monthly revenue who already understand how Wayflyer works and want to evaluate whether a provider like Uncapped, Clearco, 8fig, or another alternative is a stronger fit.

‍

The short answer: there are multiple credible Wayflyer alternatives in 2026, including Uncapped, Clearco, 8fig, Shopify Capital, Stripe Capital, and Settle, among others. The “best” choice depends on your repayment preference, total cost of capital, funding size, geography, business model, and whether you hold inventory.

‍

Here's what you'll get from reading this guide:

‍

• A clear framework for understanding non-dilutive ecommerce financing options and how they differ
• Detailed breakdowns of 10+ funding providers with eligibility, cost signals, and best-fit use cases
• A side-by-side comparison table covering key capabilities across all major alternatives
• A step-by-step decision process for choosing the right provider for your brand
• Honest guidance on when Wayflyer is still the right choice, and when it isn't

‍

Understanding Non‑Dilutive E‑commerce Financing

‍

Non-dilutive funding enables businesses to raise capital without personal guarantees or equity dilution. For ecommerce and DTC brands, this typically means revenue based advances, cash advances, term loans, lines of credit, or inventory financing, all structured so founders retain full ownership. Wayflyer operates squarely in this space, offering advances against future receivables with a fixed fee and revenue-linked repayment. It has carved out a strong position, particularly for inventory-holding brands that want fast, transparent working capital.

‍

Why do founders still compare Wayflyer with other providers? Because as a business scales, the nuances of cost structure, repayment style, eligibility criteria, and product breadth start to matter more. A financing provider that was perfect at $20K/month may not be the best fit at $500K/month, or for a brand expanding into new channels, geographies, or product categories. Understanding the landscape of non-dilutive financing options helps founders optimize their capital stack rather than settling for “good enough.”

‍

Revenue‑Based Financing vs Cash Advances

‍

Revenue-based financing (RBF) is a method of raising capital based on future revenue streams. RBF allows businesses to receive upfront cash in exchange for a percentage of future sales, with repayments typically tied to daily or monthly revenue over a 3–12 month window. The cost is usually expressed as a fixed fee rather than compounding interest. Revenue-based financing typically charges fees between 5–10%, and repayment starts immediately after funding.

‍

Wayflyer's core product works this way: it purchases a share of your future receivables and collects repayment as a percentage of daily sales. This revenue share model suits brands with variable revenue because payments drop when sales dip and rise when sales spike. But the fixed fee doesn't change regardless of how quickly you repay, which means repayment velocity significantly affects the effective cost of financing. An 8% fee repaid over 3 months costs roughly four times as much per month of use as the same fee spread over 12 months.

‍

Consider two examples. A DTC skincare brand with heavy seasonality (strong Q4, slow Q1) might prefer revenue based financing so that cash flow pressure eases during off-peak months, as payments adjust automatically. By contrast, a subscription coffee business with stable recurring revenue and predictable monthly revenue might prefer a fixed-term repayment schedule for cleaner budgeting, since the revenue-linked model gives them no advantage during months that are already consistent.

‍

Beyond repayment shape, founders also care deeply about what they can fund. Some providers focus on marketing capital, others on inventory, and others on general working capital, which brings us to the next distinction.

‍

Inventory Financing, Marketing Funding, and Working Capital

‍

Inventory financing and purchase-order funding address a specific pain point: you need to pay a supplier 60–90 days (or more) before cash comes back from customers. This type of financing bridges the gap, letting brands place larger orders or lock in better supplier pricing without draining reserves.

‍

Marketing-focused funding is capital earmarked for ad spend on platforms like Meta, Google, or TikTok. Some providers, Clearco being a notable example, have historically specialized in this use case, integrating directly with advertising platforms to underwrite based on return-on-ad-spend data. Flexible growth capital can be used for purposes such as inventory or marketing expenses, depending on the provider's terms and what your business actually needs.

‍

General working capital or a line of credit provides flexible drawdowns you can deploy across inventory, marketing, payroll, and expansion. Unlike a one-time cash advance, a revolving line lets you draw funds opportunistically, for example, pulling capital before a product launch and repaying as revenue arrives.

‍

Wayflyer offers funding primarily for inventory-holding ecommerce brands, and once the capital lands in your bank account, you have flexibility in how it's deployed. But not all alternatives serve the same needs or business models, which is exactly why many founders look beyond Wayflyer when their requirements change.

‍

Why Look for Wayflyer Alternatives in 2026?

‍

Wayflyer is a well-regarded provider. Its account management is frequently praised, funding speed is competitive, and its pricing structure is straightforward. This article isn't about escaping a bad experience. It's about recognizing that as ecommerce brands mature, specific dimensions of a financing relationship (repayment mechanics, eligibility rules, cost at scale, and product breadth) can make another lender objectively more suitable.

‍

Let's walk through the four most common reasons brands explore alternatives.

‍

Repayment Structure: Revenue Share vs Fixed Term

‍

Wayflyer typically uses revenue-linked remittances: a percentage of daily sales is automatically swept to repay the advance. This automated repayment mechanism works well in many cases, but it can create cash flow pressure during heavy growth periods or large inventory build phases. If you're reinvesting aggressively in stock ahead of peak season, having 10%+ of daily sales redirected to repayment can tighten margins at exactly the wrong moment.

‍

Some alternatives offer fixed monthly term loans or revolving lines of credit, which give founders more predictable budgeting. Repayment structures for RBF can vary widely based on individual business performance and agreements, and some brands, particularly those with 7-figure monthly ad budgets, find that small changes in the remittance percentage have disproportionately large cash impact. In those cases, a term loan with fixed monthly payments or a flexible line of credit may be a better structural fit.

‍

Eligibility Requirements and Business Model Fit

‍

Wayflyer's public eligibility criteria are clear: Wayflyer requires brands to be inventory-holding ecommerce businesses with at least six months of operating history and approximately $10,000 in average monthly revenue over the prior six months. It does not fund pure dropshippers and has specific geographic requirements. Businesses need at least six months of trading history to qualify for most non-dilutive providers, but Wayflyer's inventory requirement is more restrictive than some competitors.

‍

This means certain business models are effectively excluded: a dropshipping brand, a marketplace seller without proprietary inventory, or a SaaS+ecommerce hybrid may not qualify. Some alternatives are more flexible, funding Amazon sellers, subscription businesses, or digital product brands with lighter inventory requirements. If your business model doesn't fit Wayflyer's underwriting criteria cleanly, a different provider may be your only option.

‍

Fee Structure and Cost at Higher Funding Volumes

‍

Wayflyer charges a fixed fee of 5–10% on advances, with the specific fee percentage depending on business health, revenue history, and risk profile. For a typical DTC brand, the quoted rate often lands around 5–7%. The cost structure for revenue-based financing can include either flat fees or simple interest, and Wayflyer uses the flat fee approach, meaning the fee is set at origination and does not decrease if you repay early.

‍

This is where cost at scale becomes important. At $50K in funding, a 7% fee is $3,500, which is manageable. At $1M, it's $70,000, and if fast repayment compresses the effective term, the cost per month of use climbs sharply. Larger, more established businesses may find better pricing through alternatives offering longer terms, revolving facilities, or pricing structures where the fee adjusts with repayment duration. Some providers advertise rate reductions as you scale or offer more transparent pricing across the full term, which can materially reduce total cost at 6- or 7-figure funding levels.

‍

Product Breadth: Single Advance vs Multi‑Product Platforms

‍

Wayflyer offers a focused set of products (cash advances, term options, and rolling facilities) tailored specifically to ecommerce. This focused approach is a strength for brands that want simplicity. But many founders want a single financing provider that can handle recurring inventory orders, opportunistic marketing pushes, and ongoing working capital through a flexible line, all without managing multiple lender relationships.

‍

This is where multi-product platforms like Uncapped differentiate. We offer Term Loans with one fixed fee, alongside a Line of Credit and a Cash Advance for US brands, giving founders the ability to combine fixed-fee capital with flexible drawdowns. For founders who want more than one type of capital under one roof, without equity dilution or personal guarantees, that multi-product angle can be the main difference in choosing a provider.

‍

Top Wayflyer Alternatives for E‑commerce and Digital Brands

‍

The providers below are active in 2026 and realistically compared to Wayflyer by ecommerce founders and CFOs. This is not an exhaustive list. It covers 10 of the most commonly evaluated alternatives, including specialists in marketplace financing, embedded platform funding, and supply-chain capital.

‍

Each subsection covers the provider's target customer, funding range, repayment style, cost signals, and best-fit use cases.

‍

Uncapped: Multi‑Product Growth Capital and Line of Credit

‍

Uncapped provides non-dilutive growth capital and working capital lines for ecommerce brands and Amazon sellers. Our core offering is Term Loans from $10K to $2M, with one fixed fee from 0.7% per month and terms up to 24 months (UK and US), alongside a US Line of Credit with a fixed APR from 12.99% that you can repay early and redraw anytime, and a US Cash Advance repaid as a fixed share of sales. We make a decision within 24 hours, with no personal guarantees, no equity and no hidden fees.

‍

Key features include eligibility for businesses with at least 6 months of trading history, minimum monthly revenue thresholds ($10K+ for Amazon sellers, typically $100K+ for other online brands), and no restrictions on how the money is spent: inventory, marketing, purchase orders, hiring, and expansion. Term Loans carry one fixed fee agreed upfront, so the full cost is known before you sign, and applying doesn't affect your credit score. Existing customers can top up or refinance once part of their loan is repaid, creating a scaling facility rather than a series of discrete applications.

‍

Where Uncapped can be a stronger option vs Wayflyer: brands wanting multi-product flexibility (a term loan alongside a line of credit or cash advance), those seeking to avoid personal guarantees while accessing larger facilities, and founders who want their financing options with a single provider. That said, fees on Term Loans and the Cash Advance are fixed upfront, and repaying a Cash Advance early does not reduce its fee. The Line of Credit and Cash Advance are available in the US only.

‍

Clearco: Marketing‑Centric Revenue Advances

‍

Clearco (formerly Clearbanc) positions itself as a fast marketing and inventory funding provider for DTC brands. Clearco has processed over $3B in advances since 2015, with a strong focus on ad spend advances and platform integrations with Shopify, Amazon, and major advertising channels. Clearco's fees range from 6–12% for funding, with repayment typically via weekly deductions capped at roughly 30% of weekly sales.

‍

Clearco's strengths vs Wayflyer include deep ad platform integrations and, in some products, the ability to offer prorated fee rebates for early invoice payoff. The Clearco vs Wayflyer comparison page highlights differences in liens, terms, and funding caps. However, Clearco generally requires higher revenue thresholds (often $100,000+/month for certain products), and its effective cost rises sharply when advances are repaid quickly. Clearco's customer support is often criticized in independent reviews, which is worth considering for brands that value responsive service.

‍

8fig: Supply‑Chain and Inventory Planning Finance

‍

8fig combines working capital with supply-chain planning tools, making it ideal for inventory-heavy ecommerce sellers. Its “Growth Plan” delivers capital in tranches aligned with supply chain milestones, so you receive funding when you actually need it for POs or freight, rather than getting one lump sum and sitting on idle cash. 8fig provides up to $10 million in funding for inventory management.

‍

The cost: for every $100,000 in plan size, most sellers pay a flat fee of 6–10%. The effective cost varies dramatically: the same flat fee is far more expensive on a 3-month plan than on a longer 9–12 month cycle. 8fig requires at least $100,000+ annual revenue, approximately $12,000+ average monthly revenue, and 6+ months in business. It excludes dropshippers and sole proprietors, and currently serves US and Canadian brands on platforms like Shopify and Amazon. The tranche model suits brands with complex logistics, but some sellers report frustration with mid-plan funding adjustments.

‍

Shopify Capital and Embedded Platform Financing

‍

Shopify Capital is embedded directly into the Shopify admin: eligible merchants receive automatic offers based on store performance data. There's no separate application process, no credit check, and funding can arrive within 1–2 business days of acceptance. Repayment is via a fixed percentage of daily sales processed through Shopify Payments, with a maximum repayment term of 18 months.

‍

Shopify Capital includes minimum payment milestones: merchants must have repaid 30% of the total by 6 months and 60% by 12 months. If sales lag, manual payments may be required to meet these thresholds. The convenience is unmatched for Shopify-centric brands, but the model is less flexible for multi-channel sellers. There's no separate PO financing or invoice funding, and a UCC-style security interest may be filed. Alternative financing options for e-commerce include payment processing solutions like Stripe and PayPal, which offer their own embedded capital products.

‍

Stripe Capital and Processor‑Embedded Funding

‍

Stripe Capital surfaces offers directly in the Stripe dashboard for merchants with sufficient processing history, typically at least 90 days. It provides one-time advances or merchant cash advances with a flat fee, repaid as a percentage of daily sales processed via Stripe. Funds are often deposited the next business day.

‍

Strengths: frictionless approval, no equity dilution, no personal guarantee, and automated repayment from processing volume. Revenue-based loans often do not require credit checks, allowing quicker access to funding. However, Stripe Capital's eligibility may exclude lower-volume merchants, and the fixed fee structure means that faster repayment drives a higher effective cost, just like Wayflyer. The key difference is that Stripe Capital is embedded in the payment processor rather than being an independent financing provider, which limits its utility for brands with significant revenue outside Stripe.

‍

Settle: Payables, Inventory, and Cash‑Flow Management

‍

Settle takes a different approach: instead of advancing revenue, it finances supplier invoices and manages bill payments. For CPG and ecommerce brands with long supplier lead times, Settle smooths the cash conversion cycle by letting you pay vendors on extended terms while maintaining cash flow for operations.

‍

Features include invoice payment scheduling, AP automation, vendor management, and working capital specifically targeted at inventory-heavy brands. Where Settle can be a better alternative than Wayflyer: brands wanting deeper accounts-payable automation alongside capital, rather than just a cash advance. The pricing structure differs from revenue-based models, typically structured around invoice terms rather than a percentage of daily sales, which may suit brands with large, predictable supplier payments.

‍

Parafin, Highbeam, and Other Specialist Providers

‍

Several additional providers serve specific niches. Parafin focuses on marketplace financing, offering embedded capital products through marketplace platforms, a good fit for sellers who want funding without leaving their marketplace dashboard. Highbeam combines banking and funding into a single stack for ecommerce operators, offering treasury management alongside capital access.

‍

Lighter Capital has funded over $400M to 400+ companies since 2010, focusing on revenue based financing for SaaS companies and technology businesses, relevant for brands that blend ecommerce with software. Founderpath offers a revenue purchase agreement starting at 7% flat fee, targeting SaaS and subscription brands with strong recurring revenue. Treyd allows repayment only at the end of the term, which suits brands that want to avoid ongoing remittance pressure during inventory build phases. Treyd's fee ranges from 1.4% to 3% per month. Luca is an emerging provider whose model offers dynamic pricing based on real-time business health, with Luca's average fee reportedly around 5.2%, a signal that dynamic, performance-adjusted pricing may become more common across the sector.

‍

Regional players like Qupital (Asia/APAC cross-border ecommerce) and Payability (marketplace earnings advances) round out the landscape for brands operating outside core US/EU markets or selling primarily through third-party marketplaces.

‍

How Wayflyer Compares to These Alternatives

‍

This section provides a practical comparison layer to help readers interpret the alternatives above, not a product review of any single lender. The goal is to equip founders with the criteria and data they need for informed decisions.

‍

Key Comparison Criteria for Wayflyer Alternatives

‍

When evaluating alternatives, focus on these dimensions:

‍

• Funding speed: How quickly you move from application to cash in your bank account. Most providers highlighted here offer 24–48 hour decisions, but embedded options (Shopify, Stripe) can be even faster since they pre-qualify you automatically.
• Funding range: The minimum and maximum typical deals a provider will offer. Wayflyer ranges from $5,000 to $20,000,000; some alternatives cap lower.
• Repayment model: Revenue share (daily/weekly percentage of sales) vs fixed-term loan vs revolving line of credit. This determines cash flow impact more than almost any other factor.
• Effective cost of capital and transparency: Headline fee percentage matters, but the effective cost, accounting for repayment duration, is the true measure. Look for transparent fees with no hidden fees or surprise charges.
• Eligibility: Revenue thresholds, geographic restrictions, inventory requirements, and business model restrictions (no dropshipping, no sole proprietors, etc.).
• Product mix: Single cash advance vs multiple products (line of credit, term loan, invoice financing) under one roof.
• Founder experience: Quality of support, reporting dashboards, integrations with Shopify/Amazon/BigCommerce, and accounting tools.

‍

These criteria structure the comparison table below.

‍

Wayflyer vs Uncapped vs Other Alternatives: At‑a‑Glance Table

‍

‍

After reviewing the table, a few patterns emerge. Providers like Uncapped lean toward flexibility, offering multiple product types (term loans plus a line of credit) for brands that want optionality. Embedded providers (Shopify Capital, Stripe Capital) win on convenience and funding speed but trade off multi-channel support and product breadth. Supply-chain specialists like 8fig and Settle excel when the primary need is inventory and vendor management rather than general marketing capital.

‍

How to Choose the Right Wayflyer Alternative for Your Brand

‍

The “best” Wayflyer alternative depends on your business model, scale, and strategic goals, not just which provider advertises the lowest initial fee percentage. A provider with a 6% headline fee but 3-month effective term may cost more than one quoting 8% over 9 months. This section gives you a structured, actionable process for making the right call.

‍

Step‑by‑Step Decision Process

‍

1. Clarify your funding objective. Are you funding inventory only, blended growth (inventory + marketing), an emergency cash buffer, or expansion into new channels or geographies? E-commerce and DTC brands often seek non-dilutive financing options to avoid giving up equity, but the specific use case determines which type of funding fits best.
2. Map your cash flow pattern to a repayment preference. E-commerce businesses particularly benefit from financing models that align payments with sales performance. If your revenue is highly seasonal, a revenue share model suits months with variable sales. If your business generates steady recurring revenue, a fixed repayment schedule or revolving line of credit may offer more predictability.
3. Check eligibility and platform fit. Confirm whether you meet each provider's requirements: Shopify vs multi-platform, marketplace vs DTC, inventory-holding vs dropshipping, geographic restrictions, and minimum monthly revenue thresholds. Many RBF providers integrate with sales platforms to streamline funding processes, but integration depth varies.
4. Compare effective cost of capital, not headline fees. Model a realistic scenario: take a $250K advance and calculate the total cost under each provider assuming your actual repayment speed over 3, 6, and 12 months. Revenue-based financing typically starts repayments immediately after funding, so factor in how quickly your revenue will retire the advance. A higher fee percentage with a longer term can be cheaper than a lower fee repaid quickly.
5. Assess operational extras. Evaluate dashboards, analytics, integrations with your sales platforms (Shopify, Amazon, BigCommerce), and accounting tools. Also consider support quality: some providers offer dedicated account managers while others are largely self-service. Fundraising options like RBF cater specifically to businesses with steady revenue streams, but the operational experience varies dramatically between providers.
6. Stress-test downside scenarios. Simulate slower sales periods, supply chain delays, or off-peak months under each provider's repayment model. How do weekly deductions or daily sales sweeps affect your cash reserves if revenue drops 30%? What happens if you miss a minimum payment milestone?
7. Run a small initial facility first. When possible, start with a smaller advance to test the provider's process, support, and actual cost before committing to a larger, longer-term partnership.

‍

Encourage your finance team to model specific numbers under each option for an apples-to-apples comparison. Abstract fee ranges are far less useful than a concrete scenario based on your own revenue data.

‍

When Wayflyer Is Still the Right Choice

‍

Wayflyer remains a strong fit for inventory-holding DTC brands that value its responsive support, are comfortable with revenue-share repayments, and meet its eligibility cleanly. If your brand reliably sells physical products, operates in a supported geography, and generates sufficient monthly revenue, Wayflyer's transparent pricing structure and fast funding (offers generated as quickly as 24 hours, capital deployed rapidly) can be hard to beat for simplicity. Wayflyer offers a clear, proven model that many founders find reassuring, and there is real value in working with a provider that has a strong track record in ecommerce.

‍

It's also worth noting that a “Wayflyer or alternative” choice doesn't have to be binary. Some brands reasonably work with more than one provider over time as needs evolve, using Wayflyer for a straightforward inventory advance while tapping a line of credit from another provider for marketing spend flexibility. Non-dilutive funding enables businesses to raise capital without personal guarantees or equity dilution, and layering multiple facilities can be a smart strategy, as long as overlapping repayment obligations are carefully managed.

‍

Common Challenges When Switching from Wayflyer to an Alternative

‍

Even when a new financing provider is a better long-term fit, the transition can create operational and financial friction. Here's what to prepare for.

‍

Managing Overlapping Facilities and Cash‑Flow Timing

‍

The biggest risk when switching providers is double-counting available capital. If you accept a new advance while an existing Wayflyer facility is still being repaid via revenue share, you may pledge too high a fraction of future sales, squeezing operational cash flow at exactly the moment you need flexibility.

‍

Concrete guidance: settle or refinance existing facilities in an orderly way. Avoid using new funds purely to service old advances, as this creates a debt spiral. Re-forecast cash flow using conservative sales assumptions that account for both remittance obligations simultaneously. Repayment is tied to business performance or fixed schedules depending on the provider, so model both scenarios.

‍

Data, Integrations, and Reporting Changes

‍

Moving from one lender's dashboard to another means reconnecting Shopify stores, marketplaces, advertising accounts, and bank account feeds. Sales data may not reconcile perfectly between providers, especially if they capture revenue from different channels or use different reporting windows.

‍

A short checklist: run both systems in parallel for at least one billing cycle, export historical performance data from your outgoing provider, and validate that sales feeds match between the new provider's platform and your accounting software. This avoids surprises during early repayment periods.

‍

Legal Terms, Covenants, and Fine Print

‍

Non-dilutive financing options are typically characterized by no equity stakes being given up, but that doesn't mean the legal terms are simple. Common contractual considerations include exclusivity clauses (preventing you from taking on additional funding), UCC filings (security interests on receivables or inventory), payout redirection (where payments flow to the lender before reaching your bank account), and cross-default clauses (where defaulting on one facility triggers default on another). On guarantees, what does wayflyer require? Publicly, it is marketed as not requiring a personal guarantee, but you should still review security-interest and contractual provisions carefully.

‍

Have your finance lead or external counsel review terms before signing, especially if you already have one facility in place. Traditional lenders typically require more collateral and documentation, but non-dilutive providers still file security interests in many cases. Understanding what assets are pledged and what triggers default is essential.

‍

Conclusion and Next Steps

‍

There are strong Wayflyer alternatives available in 2026, spanning revenue based financing, embedded platform capital, supply-chain financing, and flexible lines of credit. But the right choice depends on your repayment preference, effective cost of capital, business model fit, and strategic goals, not just which provider offers the lowest headline fee or the fastest approval.

‍

Here are your immediate next steps:

‍

• Define your funding goal and repayment preference in writing: inventory, marketing, blended growth, or expansion
• Shortlist 2–3 providers based on the comparison criteria above (include Uncapped if multi-product flexibility or a line of credit is relevant to your business)
• Request term sheets from shortlisted providers on the same day and compare effective cost and cash-flow impact side by side
• Run a conservative downside scenario for each option: model a 30% revenue drop and see how repayment obligations affect your cash position
• Start with a smaller facility to test the provider's process before committing to larger volumes

‍

We make a decision within 24 hours, and most of the providers covered here move within a day or two. If you want to explore a non-dilutive alternative with flexible repayment options and a choice of term loan, line of credit or cash advance, you can check live offers through our online application to see tailored terms for your business.

‍

Additional Resources on E‑commerce Funding

‍

For founders who want to go deeper on specific topics covered in this guide, these resources provide additional frameworks and tools:

‍

• The Complete Guide to Revenue Based Finance: a detailed explainer on how RBF works, including how to calculate the true cost of fixed-fee cash advances
• Ecommerce Funding: The Complete Guide to All Your Options: a broader look at every financing option available to online brands, from merchant cash advances to invoice financing
• Inventory Loans: Everything You Need to Know: a focused guide for brands where inventory is the primary funding need
• The Only Guide to Ecommerce Loans You'll Need: a checklist-style resource for preparing funding applications, including the metrics, documents, and sales data that speed up approvals
• Revolving Line of Credit: our own resource on how to use a US line of credit to balance inventory and marketing spend across business cycles

‍