Net 60 Payment Terms Ecommerce: When to Use Them, When to Borrow, and How to Decide

Introduction

‍

Net 60 payment terms give ecommerce buyers 60 calendar days from the invoice date to pay a supplier in full. For founders running inventory-heavy brands, that 60-day window can mean the difference between funding growth from operating cash flow and scrambling for emergency capital every reorder cycle. This article helps you decide whether to negotiate net 60 with your suppliers, use external financing like working capital or revenue-based funding, or combine both.

‍

The target audience is ecommerce and Amazon brand founders doing at least low- to mid-seven figures in annual revenue who are actively deciding how to fund inventory and marketing. If you're weighing whether to push your factory from net 30 to net 60, wondering if a line of credit would be cheaper, or trying to figure out whether skipping an early payment discount is costing you more than you realise, this is for you.

‍

This article focuses on using net 60 terms with suppliers, not consumer-facing buy-now-pay-later, credit card payments on the checkout page, or accounts receivable collections from late paying customers.

‍

The short answer: Net 60 is a strong move when your sell-through time is close to 60 days and suppliers don't push up prices or deprioritize your orders. It's safer to borrow when suppliers want to raise prices by 5–8%, when you risk stockouts from being treated as a slow payer, or when early payment discounts imply a high effective annual rate that exceeds your cheapest credit.

‍

By the end of this article you'll understand:

‍

• How net 60 actually works in ecommerce supply chains (invoice vs shipment date, calendar days).
• How much extra cash net 60 can free up, with concrete examples and formulas.
• How to compare net 60 against loans, credit lines, and revenue-based financing using simple math.
• Practical steps and tactics to negotiate net 60 without wrecking supplier relationships.
• A decision framework: extend terms vs. borrow vs. combine both using solutions like Uncapped.

‍

Understanding Net 60 Payment Terms in Ecommerce

‍

Net 60 is one of the most common payment terms in B2B ecommerce. It simply means the buyer has 60 days to pay the full amount on an invoice after a specified trigger date. For inventory-heavy brands, where cash is constantly cycling through purchase orders, warehouses, and marketplace payouts, the number of days you have before payment is due directly shapes how much money you need on hand at any given moment.

‍

What “Net 60” Means in Practice

‍

Net 60 means the full invoice amount is due 60 calendar days after a specified trigger date. The 60-day countdown starts from the invoice date in most contracts, but it can also begin from the shipment date or receipt of goods depending on what's written on your purchase orders and contracts. Always check this carefully: the difference between “invoice date” and “shipment date” can add or subtract weeks of float.

‍

A quick example: if a supplier issues an invoice dated 1 March with net 60 terms, payment is due on 30 April. If instead the contract specifies “60 days from shipment” and the goods ship on 10 June, the due date falls on 9 August. Tipalti confirms that days are calendar days (including weekends and holidays), and the clock may start at invoice or shipment, so verify the trigger date in every PO.

‍

Variations exist too. “Net 60 EOM” means the 60-day clock starts at the end of the month in which the invoice was issued. “Net 60 ROG” (Receipt of Goods) starts when the buyer actually receives the shipment. Both extend effective terms further in practice.

‍

How does net 60 compare with other invoice payment terms? Net 30 means payment is due within 30 days of invoicing, the most common payment term in business. Due on receipt requires immediate payment upon invoice receipt, essentially asking the buyer to pay immediately. And milestone-based terms split the payment across production stages. Net 60 sits between these shorter terms and longer arrangements like Net 90, which is typically used with very large organizations or government contracts.

‍

How Net 60 Fits into the Ecommerce Cash Flow and Cash Conversion Cycle

‍

The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) measures how many days your cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting revenue from customers. The formula is straightforward:

‍

CCC = Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) + Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) − Days Payables Outstanding (DPO)

‍

Net 60 directly increases your DPO, which shortens your CCC and frees cash. Many inventory-centric ecommerce brands tie up 60–120 days of cash in inventory (DIO), then wait another 7–35 days for marketplace payouts (DSO). If your DPO is only 30 days, your CCC might run 90–120 days. Moving DPO from 30 to 60 can reduce your CCC by roughly 30 days-a significant shift.

‍

Consider a simplified example: a brand with DIO of 75 days, DSO of 10 days, and DPO of 30 days has a CCC of 55 days. Move DPO to 60 days and that CCC drops to 25 days, meaning cash circulates more than twice as fast.

‍

Net 60 is effectively an interest-free loan from your supplier. But like any financing source, it comes with hidden costs and risks that must be quantified before you set terms.

‍

Net 60 as an “Interest-Free Loan” from Suppliers

‍

When you extend payment terms from net 30 to net 60, you gain an extra 30 days to hold onto cash while you sell inventory and collect revenue. That's real money sitting in your accounts rather than your supplier's. Net 60 can provide cash flow relief for buyers by extending time to pay invoices, while also allowing buyers to sell inventory before paying suppliers.

‍

Think of it as “supplier financing” versus “bank or fintech financing.” Both you and a lender are essentially providing the same service-access to capital for a period of time. The question is which source costs less in total.

‍

While there's no explicit interest rate on net 60, suppliers may bake costs into prices or limit your ability to get preferred allocation. Net payment terms can lead to cash flow risks if not managed well. So the next step is to put real numbers on the cash released, and the costs incurred.

‍

How Much Cash Net 60 Can Free Up for Ecommerce Brands

‍

The “interest-free loan” framing is only useful if you quantify the loan amount. Here's the concrete math, following the logical progression from CCC to actual pounds and dollars.

‍

From Net 30 to Net 60: Working Capital Impact

‍

The formula for working capital released when extending terms is simple:

‍

Cash Freed = (Annual COGS ÷ 365) × Extra Days of Payables

‍

Take a brand with $2M in annual COGS moving from net 30 to net 60. That's 30 extra days of payables:

‍

$2,000,000 ÷ 365 ≈ $5,479 per day × 30 days ≈ $164,384 freed

‍

That $164K could fund an entire Q4 inventory reorder, a sustained paid media campaign, or a new product launch, without borrowing a penny. For context, the cost of borrowing that same amount via an 8% line of credit would be roughly $13,000 per year.

‍

Now scale it up: an $8M DTC brand moving DPO from 45 to 60 days (15 extra days):

‍

$8,000,000 ÷ 365 ≈ $21,918 per day × 15 days ≈ $328,767 freed

‍

One important caveat: this “cash released” is a one-time release. You only capture it once when you first extend terms, and you must maintain the new payment cadence to keep it. If you slip back to paying at 30 days, the benefit disappears.

‍

Aligning Net 60 with Your Sell-Through Time

‍

The principle is straightforward: your payment terms should roughly match how long it takes to sell the inventory. If it takes 60 days to sell a container of product, net 60 means you're mostly paid by customers before your supplier invoice comes due. Net payment terms can help businesses manage cash flow effectively when this alignment is right.

‍

Walk through a concrete example. A skincare brand imports a container that takes 55–65 days to sell through. On net 60 terms, the revenue from those sales lands in the brand's account right around the time the supplier invoice is due. Cash flow stays positive without any external financing.

‍

Contrast that with a fast-selling consumable (30-day sell-through) where net 60 is very generous: you're sitting on supplier credit you don't strictly need, which may not be worth the relationship capital spent negotiating it. On the other end, a seasonal home goods brand with 120-day sell-through on net 60 still faces a 60-day cash gap that supplier terms alone won't close.

‍

The takeaway: measure sell-through in days by SKU or category. Don't guess. Your accounting software or inventory platform should give you this data, so use it as the foundation for every terms negotiation.

‍

When Early-Pay Discounts Beat Net 60 (With Real Annual-Rate Math)

‍

Suppliers sometimes offer early payment discounts with structures like “2/10 net 60”-meaning you get a 2% payment discount if you pay within 10 days, otherwise the full amount is due at day 60. These incentives create a hidden cost when you choose to skip the discount and stretch to the full term.

‍

The annualization formula makes the cost explicit:

‍

Effective Annual Rate ≈ (Discount % ÷ (100% − Discount %)) × (365 ÷ (Full term days − Discount days))

‍

Here's what the numbers look like in practice:

‍

• Skipping 2/10 net 60: (2 ÷ 98) × (365 ÷ 50) ≈ 14.9% per year. You're paying the equivalent of a 14.9% annual rate for those extra 50 days of credit.
• Skipping 2/10 net 30: (2 ÷ 98) × (365 ÷ 20) ≈ 37.2% per year. With shorter terms, the implied cost skyrockets.
• Skipping 1/10 net 60: (1 ÷ 99) × (365 ÷ 50) ≈ 7.4% per year. A smaller discount on a longer window is cheaper to skip.

‍

The decision rule is clear: if your cheapest external capital (whether that's a revolving line of credit, revenue-based financing, or an inventory loan) costs less than the implied annual rate from skipping the early payment discount, you should usually borrow to take the discount rather than stretch to net 60. Early payment discounts can incentivize faster payments from clients, and sometimes taking them is the mathematically superior move.

‍

Net 60 vs Borrowing: A Practical Decision Framework for Ecommerce Founders

‍

The core decision every founder faces: ask for net 60 from suppliers or finance inventory through a lender? This section gives you a step-by-step process to choose, using your own numbers rather than rules of thumb.

‍

Step 1: Map Your Cash Cycle and Funding Gap

‍

Start by estimating how many days your cash is tied up from paying suppliers to getting paid by customers. You need three numbers:

‍

1. Calculate your rough CCC. Add your Days Inventory Outstanding (how long inventory sits before selling, often 60–90 days for ecommerce) to your Days Sales Outstanding (how long until marketplace or payment processor payouts arrive, typically 7–35 days for Amazon sellers, 0–3 days for Shopify with instant payouts). Then subtract your current DPO (existing supplier terms). Example: 75 days inventory + 14 days to get paid − 30 days payables = 59-day CCC.
2. Identify the gap in days and money. If your CCC is 59 days and you turn over $300K in COGS per month, you need roughly $590K in working capital just to keep the business running ($300K ÷ 30 × 59). During peak season, that gap might widen to 90+ days and £250K or more in additional cash reserves.
3. Note supplier constraints. Are there minimum order quantities, long lead times, or seasonal production windows that force you to buy inventory well before you can sell it? These factors make the gap more dangerous to ignore.
4. State your growth intent. Launching two new SKUs? Entering a new market? Each expansion adds to the funding requirement beyond what current terms cover.

‍

Step 2: Quantify the Real Cost of Net 60

‍

Net 60 isn't costless. Suppliers may raise prices, add surcharges, or deprioritize your orders when terms stretch beyond industry norms.

‍

Research suggests that suppliers may raise prices by roughly 5–8% when payment terms are extended 15–30 days beyond their standard terms. Verify this in your own negotiations (it varies by industry, relationship strength, and order volume), but treat it as a realistic risk, not a theoretical one.

‍

Run the numbers on a concrete example: if a 5% COGS increase hits a brand with £3M annual COGS, that's £150,000 per year in extra cost. Meanwhile, moving from net 30 to net 60 on that same spend frees only about £246,575 one time. Within two years, the ongoing price hike has consumed the entire float benefit.

‍

Qualitative costs matter too. Cash flow strains for suppliers can occur due to the 60-day wait for payments, which may cause your orders to be deprioritized: slower order processing, lower allocation during supply shortages, loss of “preferred buyer” status. A supplier who deprioritizes a slow payer can cost you more than the float gains in missed sales and emergency air freight alone. Longer payment terms increase the risk of late payments or customer defaults from the supplier's perspective, making them cautious.

‍

Step 3: Compare Against Short-Term Financing Options

‍

Here's a brief comparison of the external financing options ecommerce founders actually use.

‍

• Inventory lines of credit: Typically offer limits equal to 20–80% of inventory liquidation value. Interest costs vary widely, with banks typically cheapest and online lenders considerably more expensive. Draw periods usually run 12–24 months. Common fees include origination (1–3% of the limit) and monthly maintenance ($25–$50). These work well for established brands with strong credit and collateral.
• Traditional term loans or overdrafts from banks: Lower rates but slower approval, heavy documentation, and often personal guarantees. Better suited for stable, predictable businesses than high-growth ecommerce.
• Working capital from Uncapped: Funding based on your real sales and bank data, with a decision within 24 hours. Term Loans (UK and US) carry one fixed fee from 0.7% per month, and in the US our Line of Credit has a fixed APR from 12.99%. No equity dilution or personal guarantees.

‍

When net 60 is unavailable, comes with steep price hikes, or risks stockouts from supplier deprioritization, external financing becomes the more rational choice. Compare the annualized cost of borrowing (for example, 12–18% effective) against the implied annual rate of skipping an early-pay discount or absorbing a supplier price increase. If borrowing is cheaper, borrow.

‍

Step 4: Use a Simple Priority Order: Terms First, Financing Second

‍

The recommended decision order:

‍

1. First, negotiate better terms: A modest extension toward net 45 or net 60, or a structure with deposits plus milestones (e.g., 30% deposit, 40% pre-shipment, 30% net 30). Set payment terms that both you and the supplier can sustain.
2. If suppliers won't move enough, explore PO or inventory funding and revenue-based financing to fill the remaining gap.
3. Only rely on expensive, short-term emergency credit (high-rate credit cards, merchant cash advances) as a last resort.

‍

Now that you know when net 60 makes sense versus borrowing, you need tactics to negotiate and implement net 60 safely.

‍

Implementing Net 60 Terms with Suppliers Without Damaging Relationships

‍

This is the practical part: specific steps and tactics to ask for net 60 and get closer to it over one to three years without burning bridges with the sellers you depend on.

‍

Gradually Extending Terms Over 2–3 Years

‍

Rather than jumping from net 30 to net 60 in a single conversation, extend 10–15 days per year and build a track record. Suppliers respond to demonstrated reliability, not requests. Clear payment terms reduce the risk of delayed payments and build trust over time.

‍

A realistic year-by-year roadmap:

‍

• Year 1: Move from prepaid or net 15 to net 30. Pay every invoice on time, or early, to establish credibility. Ensure timely payments become your reputation.
• Year 2: Extend to net 45 once your on-time payment record is proven and order volumes are growing.
• Year 3: Push to net 60 if order volumes and relationship strength justify it. Monthly spend with a single supplier of $25,000–$75,000 typically makes net 60 a credible request. Below $10,000/month, most suppliers won't budge past net 30 or may require a deposit.

‍

Tangible criteria suppliers care about: consistent order sizes, low return rates, hitting MOQs reliably, predictable seasonality, and, above all, never having unpaid invoices or late fee incidents in your history.

‍

Negotiation Tactics: How to Ask for Net 60

‍

• Set price first. Lock in unit prices or annual price caps before asking for longer terms. If both you and the supplier negotiate price and terms simultaneously, they'll quietly bake 5–8% into the unit cost. Negotiate price and terms separately and benchmark against past quotes and competing vendors.
• Anchor slightly higher. If you're truly seeking net 60, ask for net 75 or net 90. This gives room to meet in the middle. The supplier feels like they've “won” the negotiation while you land on your target.
• Match terms to sell-through. Show suppliers your sales data-sell-through curves, PO forecasts, growth projections. When you can demonstrate that inventory converts to revenue within roughly 60 days, you're making a commercially reasonable request, not an opportunistic one.
• Offer value in return. Larger POs, longer contract commitments, co-marketing, better forecasts, or agreeing to early payment discounts during off-peak months. Every client relationship is two-sided.
• Use multiple suppliers as a bargaining chip, carefully. Having alternatives strengthens your position, but constantly switching factories or logistics partners erodes trust and quality. Use alternatives to negotiate, not to threaten.

‍

Structuring Terms Beyond Simple “Net 60”

‍

Hybrid structures reduce risk for both you and the supplier:

‍

• Deposit plus net 60 on the balance: 20–30% upfront, 70–80% net 60. The supplier gets cash flow certainty on the deposit; you get float on the larger portion.
• Milestone-based releases for large production runs: Deposit at PO, second payment at QC pass, final payment net 60 after shipment. This aligns payment with delivery of goods or services.
• Seasonal variations: Tighter terms during low season when your cash needs are modest, extended terms during peak inventory buildup when every pound or dollar of working capital matters.

‍

Put everything in writing. Use contract addenda or updated POs to document trigger dates (invoice vs shipment), calendar-day counts, and any discount clauses. Payment terms should be displayed on every invoice issued, and the process for resolving disputes should be agreed upfront.

‍

Comparing Net 60 with Other Ecommerce Financing Tools

‍

Net 60 is one tool in a broader toolkit. Here's how it stacks up against the alternatives ecommerce founders most commonly use.

‍

Net 60 vs Inventory Line of Credit vs Uncapped Funding

‍

‍

When net 60 alone is usually best: You have a strong supplier relationship, sell-through aligns with 60 days, pricing is stable, and you're spending $25K–$75K+ per month with that supplier.

‍

When a mix of modestly extended terms plus external financing often delivers better cost and resilience: Supplier won't move past net 45 without steep price increases, you're heading into a seasonal peak that requires more inventory than terms alone can fund, or your growth plan demands capital faster than supplier negotiations allow. Net payment terms can increase sales by extending credit, but they work best alongside complementary funding sources.

‍

Using Uncapped Alongside Net 60 Terms

‍

Consider a realistic scenario: an ecommerce brand already on net 45 with its primary supplier needs an extra £200K to fund a big Q4 inventory purchase and ad campaign. Pushing to net 75 or net 90 would risk a price hike and deprioritization. Instead, the brand uses our working capital to cover the gap.

‍

Relevant features for this decision:

‍

• Non-dilutive capital from $10K to $2M, with a decision within 24 hours. There are no restrictions on how the money is spent: inventory, marketing, marketplace fees, hiring, or international expansion.
• Term Loans carry one fixed fee, so the full cost is known upfront. In the US, our Cash Advance is repaid as a fixed share of sales, so repayments fall when sales slow.
• No personal guarantees or equity dilution, in contrast to some lines of credit or investors.
• Our Amazon seller funding is open to Amazon sellers with as little as $10K in monthly revenue and 6+ months of trading history.

‍

For US Amazon sellers, we also offer Daily Payout (early access): an advance of up to 80% of the Amazon balance you're waiting on, every day, instead of waiting for the standard settlement cycle, which can stretch to 35 days with holds. Amazon keeps paying you directly, and we settle when that payout lands. This reduces the mismatch between when you need to pay suppliers and when you actually get paid.

‍

Common Challenges with Net 60 in Ecommerce (and How to Solve Them)

‍

Pushing for net 60 can backfire if not managed well. Here are the most common ecommerce-specific problems and practical solutions. Approval for net 60 terms typically involves credit checks on buyers, and clear payment terms improve cash flow and financial stability, but only if the following risks are addressed.

‍

Challenge 1: Supplier Price Hikes and Hidden Costs

‍

The problem: Your supplier agrees to net 60 but raises FOB prices or adds surcharges for freight, packaging, or “extended terms administration.” The overdue amount of float benefit gets eaten by margin compression.

‍

The solution:

‍

• Negotiate price and terms separately. Benchmark unit costs against competing vendors and your own past quotes before agreeing to extended terms.
• Run a quick margin simulation before signing, incorporating logistics, duties, and marketing spend. If the price increase exceeds the value of the float, the deal isn't worth it.

‍

Challenge 2: Being Deprioritized as a “Slow Payer”

‍

The problem: Longer payment terms can cause suppliers to prioritize faster-paying customers, leading to production delays, longer lead times, and stockouts on critical SKUs. Late payments can significantly strain cash flow management for your supplier, and they'll protect themselves.

‍

The solution:

‍

• Maintain an impeccable on-time (or early) payment history even with longer terms. Never let an invoice become overdue.
• Use partial early payments strategically: paying early on key SKUs signals reliability and keeps you at the front of the production queue.
• Keep a backup supplier or safety stock for your most critical products. Don't let a single company control your delivery timeline completely.

‍

Challenge 3: Misaligned Terms and Sell-Through Time

‍

The problem: Net 60 terms on SKUs that take 90–180 days to sell fully, leaving a persistent cash gap. The buyer has committed to a due date before the money from sales has arrived.

‍

The solution:

‍

• Segment terms by SKU category. Aim for longer terms on slow movers (or accept that you'll need financing for them) and accept shorter terms where inventory turns fast.
• Use financing specifically for slow-moving or launch inventory (via our Term Loans, a line of credit, or PO finance) instead of trying to force blanket net 60 across your entire purchase plan.

‍

Challenge 4: Missing Out on Profitable Early-Pay Discounts

‍

The problem: You take net 60 instead of using cheaper financing to pay within 10 days and earn a 1–2% discount. Over the course of a year, those missed discounts add up to more than what borrowing would have cost.

‍

The solution:

‍

• Use the annual-rate formula introduced earlier to systematically evaluate every discount offered. Create invoices and track discount terms in your accounting software.
• Implement a policy: if the discount's implied annual rate is higher than the total cost of your cheapest credit (for example, a line of credit), borrow to take the discount. A 14.9% implied cost on a skipped 2/10 net 60 discount is expensive when your available financing costs less.

‍

Conclusion and Next Steps

‍

Net 60 can dramatically improve ecommerce cash flow when aligned with sell-through and priced fairly. But it must be weighed against early-pay discounts, supplier behaviour, and alternative funding costs. The right payment terms aren't always the longest ones; they're the ones that minimize your total cost of capital while keeping your supply chain reliable.

‍

Here are your immediate next steps:

‍

1. Calculate your current CCC and estimate how much cash net 60 could free up using the formula: (Annual COGS ÷ 365) × extra days of payables.
2. Review supplier contracts to confirm how your days are counted (invoice date vs shipment date) and where net terms currently sit.
3. Identify 1–2 key suppliers where gradual term extensions (10–15 days) are realistic in the next 12 months.
4. Build a simple model comparing net 60, early-pay discounts, and borrowing options using your actual COGS and growth plans.
5. If the model shows a persistent cash gap or opportunity cost, consider speaking with us about a Term Loan for inventory working capital.

‍

Related areas worth exploring next: inventory planning and demand forecasting to sharpen your DIO estimates, 13-week cash flow modelling to stress-test seasonal peaks, and channel mix decisions (DTC vs marketplace vs wholesale) that directly affect your DSO and overall CCC.

‍

Additional Resources and FAQ

‍

This final section combines a short resource list with frequently asked questions tailored to ecommerce founders navigating net 60 decisions.

‍

Recommended Tools and Models

‍

• Working capital release spreadsheet: Build a simple template using the formula (Annual COGS ÷ 365) × extra days of payables. Model scenarios at net 30, net 45, and net 60 across different COGS levels to see the cash impact before you negotiate.
• 13-week cash flow planning model: Essential for inventory-heavy ecommerce brands, especially around seasonal peaks. Map weekly inflows (marketplace payouts, DTC receipts) against outflows (supplier payments, ad spend, duties) to spot gaps before they become crises.
• Supplier contract review checklist: For each PO and contract, verify the trigger date (invoice vs shipment), confirm calendar vs business days, document any discount clauses, and flag any new client terms that differ from previous agreements.
• Our ecommerce resources: For deeper reading on ecommerce funding options, Amazon seller strategies, and working capital planning, our resource library covers the full spectrum of financing decisions for online brands.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions About Net 60 in Ecommerce

‍

Is net 60 counted in calendar or business days for ecommerce suppliers? Net 60 uses calendar days unless the contract explicitly states business days only. This is the standard across the industry. Always check the exact language in your purchase order or supplier agreement: missing the 60-day payment deadline can result in late fees or interest charges, and ambiguity about the date can cause disputes.

‍

Can I offer my wholesale customers net 60 while also asking my suppliers for net 60? You can, but it stacks risk. If your wholesale customer pays late, or slowly, you still owe your supplier on the original due date. This increases your CCC and can create serious cash gaps. Manage this by requiring credit checks on wholesale buyers, setting stricter terms for any new client, and maintaining cash reserves or a financing facility to bridge timing mismatches; some buyers may need due on receipt instead, especially before trust is established, which requires immediate payment upon invoice receipt. Clear payment terms reduce the risk of delayed payments when you extend trade credit to customers. Offering net terms can help build long-term customer relationships, but only if both sides of the ledger are managed carefully. Net 60 can attract larger orders from customers who prefer deferred payments.

‍

What's a reasonable first step if my suppliers currently insist on payment upfront? Start with a deposit-plus-balance structure: 30% deposit via bank transfer at PO, 70% on shipment or within net 30. Prove reliability over 6–12 months of timely payments, then propose moving to net 30 on the full amount. From there, you can gradually extend toward net 45 and eventually net 60 as your order volume and track record grow.

‍

At what revenue level does it make sense to stop relying solely on supplier terms and start using external funding? Once your monthly COGS is in the tens or hundreds of thousands and growth is constrained by available cash (whether from seasonal peaks, new product launches, or marketplace expansion), supplier terms alone rarely cover the full requirement. At that point, combining modestly extended terms with a facility like our Term Loans or Line of Credit gives you both the float from suppliers and the flexibility to invest in advance of sales.

‍

How quickly can I access capital from Uncapped compared with negotiating net 60? We make a decision within 24 hours, and many Amazon offers come through in minutes (eligibility requires 6+ months of trading history and minimum revenue thresholds, as low as $10K/month for Amazon sellers). Negotiating net 60 with suppliers typically takes months of relationship building, consistent order growth, and proven on-time payment. External funding fills shorter, more urgent gaps while you work on terms in parallel. Net 60 terms are primarily used in B2B ecommerce, and building toward them is a medium-term strategy, not an overnight fix.

‍